Skip to main content
Compare

Vendure vs Medusa

Two open-source Node.js commerce platforms. Both give you the code and the data. The difference is where complex B2B comes from.

The short answer

Choose Vendure when

  • Typed GraphQL contracts are a requirement
  • Hierarchies, RBAC, SSO and audit must be supported product
  • You need vendor support behind a self-hosted deployment
  • MySQL or MariaDB is mandated

Choose Medusa when

  • Your policy requires an MIT licence
  • A durable workflows engine is central to your build
  • Your team is Next.js-centric and speed to demo is the goal
  • You are happy to own and maintain the B2B layer yourself
Pain points

The biggest pain points on Medusa, and how Vendure solves them

Vendure B2B capabilities by plan, from 9 of 32 on Starter to all 32 on Enterprise.
1 of 3

B2B depth is a supported product, not a starter fork

Medusa's companies, quotes, approvals and spending limits ship as a B2B starter template, which is clone-and-own code your team then maintains, and RBAC, SSO and audit logs sit behind Medusa Enterprise. Vendure ships the same territory as plan entitlements: company accounts and quotes from Starter, organization hierarchy at Growth, contract pricing and single-level order approvals at Scale, negotiation, multi-level approvals and PunchOut (cXML) at Enterprise.

Medusa customisations are modules, workflows, subscribers and API routes inside your Medusa application, and a custom module reaches clients through REST routes you write. Vendure plugins sit next to Vendure Core as TypeScript modules, and what they add appears in the GraphQL schema.
2 of 3

Typed contracts and a database choice

Vendure is GraphQL Shop and Admin APIs end to end, with custom fields that propagate into the schema and first-class custom entities, on PostgreSQL, MySQL or MariaDB. Medusa is REST-only with no official GraphQL, and PostgreSQL only. If you have a typed client contract or a non-PostgreSQL mandate, that decides the question before anything else does.

Medusa runs self-hosted, with PostgreSQL and Redis, or on Medusa Cloud, and vendor support with an SLA comes with its Enterprise plan. Vendure self-hosts on any cloud or on-premises, with data in PostgreSQL, MySQL or MariaDB.
3 of 3

Governance is in the published plans, wherever you host

RBAC, SSO and audit logs come with Medusa's Enterprise plan. Vendure's single sign-on and audit log arrive at Scale as supported product, and the plan entitlements travel with a self-hosted deployment on your own cloud or on-premises, with the GPLv3 core and your data in your own SQL database.

How they compare

Six dimensions, the same six on every Vendure comparison page. Every claim about Medusa is sourced at the foot of this page.

Vendure compared with Medusa across six dimensions: architecture and extensibility, licensing and cost model, B2B depth, hosting and operations, ecosystem and talent, and migration effort.
DimensionVendureMedusa
Architecture and extensibilityVendureTypeScript end to end on NestJS, with GraphQL Shop and Admin APIs. Plugins sit beside the core. No forks, no extension cap.MedusaNode and TypeScript on Express, REST only with no official GraphQL, PostgreSQL only, Redis recommended in production. A distinctive durable Workflows engine.
Licensing and cost modelVendureFree open-source core under GPLv3. Four flat, cumulative plans from €199 a month on a 12-month term, with Enterprise from €60,000 a year. No GMV, per-order or per-user fees.MedusaMIT core, free, with some Enterprise features under a commercial licence. Cloud at $29, $99 or $299 a month plus usage, with 0% GMV fees. RBAC, SSO and audit logs are Enterprise only.
B2B depthVendureCompany accounts and quotes from Starter. Organization hierarchy at Growth. Contract pricing, single-level order approvals, the audit log and the Next.js B2B storefront at Scale. PunchOut (cXML), Configurator and multi-level approvals with timeouts and delegation at Enterprise.MedusaSolid core primitives: customer groups, price lists, draft orders. Companies, quotes, approvals and spending limits ship as a B2B starter template you clone and maintain.
Hosting and operationsVendureSelf-host on any cloud or on-premises, in any region. Managed Vendure Cloud is planned for Q1 2027, with a base set of Cloud resources in each paid plan.MedusaSelf-host with PostgreSQL and Redis, or use Medusa Cloud. Vendor support with an SLA comes with the Enterprise plan.
Ecosystem and talentVendureMainstream TypeScript, Node and GraphQL. No proprietary skill silo.MedusaAn active project with monthly releases.
Migration effortVendureRarely a replatform. Where it happens, catalogue and orders import from PostgreSQL and the Next.js storefront is re-pointed at the GraphQL API.MedusaNot applicable.

Vendure pricing: a free open-source core, then four flat tiers

Vendure Core is free under GPLv3. Starter, Growth, Scale and Enterprise add B2B capabilities cumulatively, on a flat fee with no GMV, per-order or per-user charges.

Compare tiers and pricing
Where each platform is strong

Where Medusa is strong

Where Medusa is the better answer, we say so. For a developer-led build, Medusa fits. This comparison is about what the B2B layer costs to own.

  1. MIT licence

    An MIT core, with some Enterprise features under a commercial licence, and full code and data ownership. That is the same argument we make for open source, and on the licence itself Medusa's is the more permissive of the two.

  2. An active, production-ready project

    An active project with monthly releases, on a modular architecture. Medusa is production-ready and we would not suggest otherwise; this comparison does not turn on that.

  3. A fast, inexpensive start for developer-led builds

    Cloud from $29 a month with 0% GMV fees and official Next.js starters. Its durable Workflows engine undoes completed steps in reverse order when a later step fails. For D2C and time to first demo, especially on Next.js-centric teams, it is a strong fit.

Migration triggers

When teams pick Vendure over Medusa

Medusa is rarely a replatform target. This is an evaluation-stage contest, and these are the requirements that tip the fit.

  • Typed GraphQL contracts

    are a stated requirement rather than a preference

  • Real organisation hierarchies, RBAC, SSO and audit trails

    are wanted as supported product rather than as a starter fork your team maintains

  • Multi-language without a feature flag

    is needed in production today

  • Vendor support behind a self-hosted deployment

    on a published plan rather than an enterprise contract

  • A non-PostgreSQL database

    is mandated by the organisation

Outgrowing a Medusa B2B build?

This is usually an evaluation rather than a replatform. Where teams do move, the Next.js work carries over conceptually and workflows become Vendure plugins. Migration guides are being written; the hub has what exists today.

IBMHans Kohler AGBreitlingKlektMunchSwileQVCHemglassFeddersen GroupFlowtechWilhelm WeishäuplSKYdeals

Teams building complex commerce with Vendure

FAQ

Vendure and Medusa, answered

Sources (10) · claims last checked 2026
  1. Medusa developer documentation: REST API routes · docs.medusajs.com
  2. Medusa developer documentation: the durable Workflows engine · docs.medusajs.com
  3. Medusa Redis Event Module: recommended in production · docs.medusajs.com
  4. Medusa Translation Module: currently behind a feature flag · docs.medusajs.com
  5. Medusa pricing: Cloud tiers, usage, 0% GMV fees, and the Enterprise plan with support SLAs, RBAC, SSO and audit logs · medusajs.com/pricing
  6. Medusa B2B starter template: companies, quotes, approvals and spending limits · github.com/medusajs/b2b-starter
  7. Medusa repository: monthly release cadence · github.com/medusajs/medusa
  8. Medusa licence: MIT, except the Enterprise Edition materials under a separate licence · github.com/medusajs/medusa/blob/develop/LICENSE
  9. Vendure developer documentation: plugins, custom fields, custom entities and supported databases · docs.vendure.io
  10. Vendure pricing and plans · vendure.io/pricing